On June 7, 2013, I
participated in a HuffPost Live segment called, "Get Rich Quick With Education
Reform." Two articles that
are critical of school reform, notably, charter schools, standardized testing
and increasing attention on teacher accountability, inspired the segment (see
below). I was one of four panelists on
the segment, and the only academic. Two of the panelists are writers for online
magazines and the fourth panelist is a parent in New Orleans. The experience
was interesting. From my perspective, the general discourse about school reform
lacks important nuance and complexity and ignores larger structural issues. In
other words, it is far easier to blame student underachievement solely on
teachers rather than consider the impact of inequities relative to resources
and mandatory standardized testing as a measurement of student learning and
teacher effectiveness. During the segment,
one of the panelists who were critical of the reform, especially charter
schools and teacher accountability, raised poverty as a significant factor in
student learning. While research suggests that poverty (among other factors)
significantly impacts student achievement, this correlation fails to
contextualize how poverty impacts student learning and achievement. Thus, while
the segment was ostensibly about the profit motive of school reform, the
discussion focused mainly on the claims made by reformers to justify reform
policies that call for more testing, testing preparation, and teacher
accountability, rather than the relationship between these three reforms and
growing education market.
Saturday, June 15, 2013
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment