Last week Teach For America (TFA) founder and CEO Wendy Kopp
resigned,
er, promoted herself out of her CEO position with TFA and to the char of the
board, replacing education expert biographer Walter
Isaacson (known recently for penning the life
story of Apple CEO Steve Jobs). Kopp
will, according to the press release, also continue to serve as CEO of Teach For All – the international spin off
version of the domestic TFA. Replacing
Kopp at the helm of TFA will be Matt Kramer (formerly the President) and Elisa
Villanueva (formerly the Chief Operating Officer).
I focus here on Kramer’s role in the future of TFA as he,
compared to Villanueva, has more experience as a leader of TFA as the former
President. Kramer began his leadership
stint within TFA after serving at McKinsey & Company (business and finance
consulting). Additionally, Kramer serves
as the lead of TFA’s lobbying arm Leadership for Educational Equity, which
seeks to assist TFA alumnae with political campaigns via webhosting and
donations. And while Wendy Kopp
certainly has no background in education (a point which made Steven
Colbert break character exhibiting a chuckle) there are three concerns, (1)
the rise of non-education “experts” in education policy; (2) the disposition of
business minded individuals operating within democratic spaces; and (3) viewing
human capital as replaceable cogs whether they do good or cause problems.
The rise of non-education
“experts” in education policy is a point that has been exercised by others. And, as stated, while the previous leadership
of TFA was no closer to the classroom in terms of practicum, the new leadership
is further away in terms of educational dispositions. In other words, a business model treats
individuals as numbers, units, and thus… as replaceable cogs, rather than
celebrating individuality. Workers are
to submit and work relentlessly
(a phrase TFA prides itself on) towards a prescribed goal…in the case of
corporate education reform, that goal is increased test scores. Moreover, requiring workers (in this case
teachers) to work without regard to their own wellbeing
requires a repertoire of others who can replace the fallen. In fact, the founders of KIPP acknowledge
that a teacher in their schools could not sustain the level of requirements
demanded and thus rely on “fresh blood” provided by TFA (see, for example, Horn, 2011; and Lack, 2011).
Matt Kramer’s rise to the top of TFA highlights the ever
increasingly changing goal of the organization.
That is, starting with the goal of filling vacant teaching positions
with the “best and brightest” has now fully morphed into an organization that
is proud to say that teaching is not the ends, rather, the means. The goal is to produce corps members who,
having pedagogical training only at the hands of TFA, teach for two years, leave
as “education experts” who will then take over the reigns – or create them via
charters or non-profits – of organizations that seek to further implement
myopic educational reforms of “no excuses,” blaming teachers, and testing as an
indication of learning and subsequent worth.
If you’ve only ever known one way of perceiving and engaging with the
world you will continue to champion that way as appropriate. As corps members rise through the proverbial
ranks of education reform having accepted TFA’s business model, there will be
less room for democratic spaces that treat teachers and students as humans
within education. TFA’s insistence on
leading the education reform movement with business-minded frameworks will
certainly only further exacerbate the subversion of democracy in education in
favor of what is most efficient and profitable.
References
No comments:
Post a Comment